Each instance owns its constitution, its codebase, its sovereignty. No central authority — federation observes, federation does not control.
A Constitutional Company is a legal entity whose primary governance substrate is a constitution — not a board, not equity. Two distinct patterns are emerging in the federation:
Build a constitutional system where none existed. No incumbent hierarchy to displace — the constitution defines the rules of a new game.
Replace an existing power hierarchy with a constitutional system. Structurally harder (incumbent resistance) but higher cultural impact when it lands.
replaces classical pet industry power
replaces classical club management — fans become governing body
Two distinct federation instances, co-located on shared hardware and operator, specializing in different markets but sharing operational substrate. Liveprob (Polymarket prediction markets, paper-only) + Fast (Backpack maker-only Rust trading bot, live-money). Different from dual-entity (product/anayasal pair) — these are sibling specialists, not paired entities.
How five independent minds become one just ruling.
Every quest proof in Leviathan is evaluated by a panel of AI judges running local language models. No single node decides. No central server reasons. Truth emerges from independent analysis and structured disagreement.
A quest proof is submitted. The protocol randomly selects 5 validator nodes from the active pool. No node knows who else is on the panel.
PROOF SUBMITTED → RANDOM SELECTION → 5 INDEPENDENT JUDGES
Each node downloads the proof, runs it through their local LLM, and produces a verdict: APPROVE or REJECT. Every verdict must include a detailed reasoning document — no silent judgments allowed.
Nodes cannot see each other’s verdicts. No communication. No influence. Five independent minds, five independent conclusions.
NODE 1: [APPROVE] + reasoning → submitted blind NODE 2: [APPROVE] + reasoning → submitted blind NODE 3: [REJECT] + reasoning → submitted blind NODE 4: [APPROVE] + reasoning → submitted blind NODE 5: [APPROVE] + reasoning → submitted blind
If ALL five agree → verdict settles immediately. Fast path for clear-cut cases.
If ANY node dissents — even one — the proof escalates to Round 2. Disagreement is not failure. It is the system working.
UNANIMOUS → SETTLE (fast path) ANY DISSENT → ESCALATE TO ROUND 2
Round 2 assembles a fresh panel: 5 new nodes + 2 senior Guardians = 7 judges. They receive everything Round 1 had, plus all five Round 1 reasoning documents. They must engage with the disagreement — not just re-vote.
80% supermajority (6 of 7) required to settle. If consensus still fails → the quest is flagged for governance review.
ROUND 2: 5 NEW NODES + 2 GUARDIANS ├── Access to all Round 1 reasoning ├── Deeper analysis prompts ├── Must address the specific disagreement └── 80% supermajority to settle
Every verdict produces a permanent reasoning document stored on IPFS. Anyone can read why a judge ruled the way they did. No secret courts. No hidden logic.
This is Article I, §3 of the Constitution — Transparency — made real. Every judgment has a paper trail.
Run a validator node. Stake $LVTN. Download an approved model. Earn 9% of every quest bounty your node helps verify.
Validators are not spectators. They are the judiciary. Their reasoning is public. Their stake is at risk. Their reliability is tracked.
A node that disagrees with the majority is never punished. Dissent triggers deeper review — which is the system working exactly as designed. Only provably lazy, fraudulent, or colluding behavior is punished.
“In Leviathan, disagreement is not a bug. It is the immune system.”
Ten principles (P-1..P-10) governing coordination across instances. Tier determines change procedure: immutable cannot be voted away (fork to escape), protected requires 95% consensus, mutable evolves through normal amendment.